The clash between AI-generated music and traditional copyright frameworks is intensifying. From lawsuits targeting startups like Suno and Udio to landmark rulings in China and the EU, the battle over ownership, creativity, and ethics is reshaping the music industry. Dive into the latest legal skirmishes, artist backlash, and emerging solutions as generative AI collides with intellectual property laws.
The Legal Firestorm: Record Labels vs. AI Startups
In June 2024, Warner Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, and Universal Music Group launched lawsuits against AI music generators Suno and Udio, seeking $150,000 per song allegedly infringed. The labels claim Udio's viral track BBL Drizzy and Suno's Prancing Queen mimic copyrighted melodies. Udio's CEO countered that their models produce "transformative" outputs, but leaked audio comparisons of AI-generated Mariah Carey-style tracks fueled skepticism.
Why This Matters for Your Playlist
If labels win, AI platforms may need licenses for training data—potentially raising subscription costs or restricting services. Independent artists like China's Li Mo already face crises: his AI-assisted hit Quantum Rose triggered a 2025 ruling requiring 15% royalties to original composers.
Global Legal Landmines: From Beijing to Brussels
China's 2025 Quantum Rose case set a "70% human contribution" threshold for copyright eligibility, while the EU's **Artificial Intelligence Act** mandates "AI-generated" labels and transparent training data. U.S. courts, however, are wrestling with **fair use** defenses—a clash that could fragment global copyright norms.
The TikTok Effect
AI tools like Suno and MakeBestMusic enabled viral tracks on TikTok, but platforms now risk lawsuits if they host unlicensed AI music. Udio's user base surged to 10 million in 2023, yet labels demand takedowns of tracks resembling hits like All I Want for Christmas Is You.
See More Content about AI NEWS