Streaming services like Spotify, Apple Music, Deezer, and Amazon Music have long been celebrated for democratizing access to music. But in 2025, a new wave has taken over: AI-generated music. With new tools like Suno, Udio, Boomy, and Soundraw producing thousands of songs per day, streaming services are being overrun by AI-generated music. This surge isn’t just a curiosity—it’s a transformation reshaping music discovery, creator income, and the integrity of digital platforms.
This article explores how and why streaming services are becoming saturated with AI music, the risks involved, and what listeners, artists, and industry leaders can do next.
The Explosion of AI-Generated Music: Numbers You Can’t Ignore
AI music isn’t a niche anymore—it’s mainstream. Platforms are being flooded with machine-generated songs at an unprecedented rate:
Deezer reports 18% of daily uploads are AI-generated tracks, most from services like Boomy, Suno, and Soundraw. That’s about 20,000 tracks per day, according to their internal data.
According to a 2024 WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) study, AI music farms are flooding platforms with auto-generated content and inflating stream counts via bots.
Spotify currently receives over 100,000 tracks per day, many of which are AI-assisted, with a significant percentage being entirely AI-made.
Platforms originally designed to surface authentic creativity are now struggling to sift through enormous volumes of algorithmically generated content—some good, some spammy, and much of it indistinguishable at first glance.
Why Are Streaming Services Being Overrun by AI Music?
Several forces are fueling this surge:
1. Accessible AI Tools
AI platforms like Suno, Udio, and Boomy make music generation as easy as typing a sentence. No instruments, no DAW, no experience required. A track can be made in under a minute.
2. Monetization Incentives
AI-generated songs can still be monetized. Many of them are uploaded to Spotify via distributors like DistroKid or Tunecore, earning royalties even if they’re low-quality or generic. Some uploaders create hundreds or thousands of such songs to maximize passive income.
3. Streaming Farm Fraud
Bad actors use AI to mass-produce songs and inflate streams with bots. This manipulation pulls money from the same royalty pool as legitimate artists, undermining fair revenue distribution.
4. Lack of Filtering Tools
Until recently, most streaming services had no concrete method for identifying or labeling AI content. That’s changing, but slowly.
Impact on Listeners: Diluted Discovery, Lower Trust
Listeners are starting to notice.
Spotify users complain that their Release Radar and Discover Weekly playlists are full of low-effort, AI-made tracks. Reddit threads detail how fake “bands” with watercolor cover art and emotionless vocals show up repeatedly, crowding out authentic music from real artists.
The issue isn’t that AI can’t make good music—it can. But the signal-to-noise ratio has dropped dramatically. This makes music discovery more frustrating and potentially causes users to lose trust in platform recommendations.
Impact on Artists: Shrinking Revenue and Visibility
Human creators are directly affected:
Lower payouts: Streaming royalties are shared across all tracks. As AI-generated songs multiply, they dilute the royalty pool. Some estimates suggest independent artists could lose 20–30% of their streaming income by 2028 if AI growth goes unchecked.
Algorithmic invisibility: With tens of thousands of AI songs entering the system daily, real artists are pushed deeper into obscurity.
Brand confusion: AI artists are using names and visuals that mimic human creators. Listeners may unknowingly follow fake artists while ignoring legitimate ones.
Platforms like Deezer and Spotify have acknowledged the issue, but solutions are only just beginning to take shape.
What Are Streaming Platforms Doing to Combat the AI Flood?
To address the AI music overload, several services are now taking action:
Deezer
Introduced AI tagging in 2024 to identify tracks made by generative models.
Developed algorithms to refuse payouts to accounts uploading spammy or fraudulent AI music.
Spotify
Investing in AI detection tools to scan metadata and audio signatures.
Partnering with third-party services like Vermillio and Spawning.ai to track AI training and licensing.
Planning to implement watermarking standards to identify AI content.
YouTube Music
Employs Content ID-style fingerprinting for AI-generated tracks.
Requires creators to disclose AI use in metadata.
Still, enforcement is uneven, and the arms race between bad actors and detection systems continues.
Solutions That Could Bring Balance
Here’s what could help slow the AI flood and restore balance on streaming services:
Mandatory AI labeling: All platforms should require creators to tag AI-generated content—and penalize non-compliance.
Separate AI charts or filters: Let users opt-in or opt-out of AI-generated music.
Royalty segmentation: Human artists and AI creators shouldn’t draw from the same pool.
Training data transparency: Platforms and tools should reveal which datasets were used to generate the music.
Rights-holder opt-outs: Musicians should be able to block their work from being used in AI model training.
These changes would require collaboration between tech companies, distributors, musicians, and policy-makers—but the pressure is mounting.
Real-World Examples: Platforms and Products Affected
Boomy: Temporarily banned by Spotify in 2023 due to streaming fraud concerns but reinstated after internal reviews.
Suno: Recently acquired WavTool to expand its music production capabilities, raising both excitement and IP concerns.
Udio: Facing ongoing lawsuits from major labels while expanding editing features like its new Sessions interface.
All three are shaping the future of AI music—but also contributing to the saturation of digital streaming platforms.
Conclusion: The Future of Music in the Age of AI Saturation
AI is here to stay. It offers incredible creative possibilities. But right now, streaming services are being overrun by AI-generated music, and the consequences are hitting everyone—from new fans to full-time musicians.
Without clearer boundaries, better regulation, and more transparent curation, the risk is a digital environment where authenticity is buried under automation. Platforms must act swiftly to balance innovation with integrity, or they risk alienating the very artists and audiences they were built to serve.
FAQs
Q1: How much AI music is on Spotify right now?
Spotify receives over 100,000 tracks daily, with estimates suggesting 15–20% are AI-generated.
Q2: Can I filter out AI-generated music from my playlists?
Not yet on most platforms. Deezer has begun tagging AI tracks, but Spotify and Apple Music lack filter options.
Q3: Are AI tracks earning royalties?
Yes. Unless flagged for fraud, AI music uploaded through standard distributors can earn royalties just like human-made tracks.
Q4: Why does this matter to independent artists?
Because AI music dilutes visibility and payouts. The more AI content in the system, the less room there is for human creativity.
Q5: Are there AI-free music platforms?
Currently, most mainstream services host both AI and human music. Niche platforms may emerge, but options are limited.
Learn more about AI MUSIC
